|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
536 U.S. 639
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 27, 2002
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
00-1751
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Doris Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al. v. Tom Simmons-Harris, et al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Ohio's school voucher program does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Establishment_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Ohio
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
school choice cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
separation of church and state
school vouchers
|
|
gptkbp:votingSystem
|
5-4
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_Establishment_Clause_case_law
gptkb:Institute_for_Justice
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
|