Statements (79)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:applicant_nationality |
gptkb:British
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Examined in legal textbooks.
Examines state interference. Influenced child protection policies. Relevant to child custody cases. |
| gptkbp:case_legal_analysis_summary |
Summary of legal implications.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_documentation |
Documented in legal reports.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_documentation_summary |
Summary of legal documentation.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_impact_summary |
Summary of impact on law.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_summary |
Summary of legal precedent.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_relevance |
Relevant to ongoing legal discussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_relevance_summary |
Summary of legal relevance.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_significance_summary |
Summary of legal significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Available in legal databases.
Involves a minor's rights. Involves child custody and privacy rights. No. 29392/95 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Judgment in favor of the applicant
Affirmed the importance of privacy. Compensation for damages. Final judgment. Increased awareness of privacy issues. Judgment favored the applicant's privacy rights. Majority opinion favored the applicant. Recognition of privacy rights. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Influence on privacy rights
Significant for child welfare. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Human rights case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Amendments to family law.
Significant impact on privacy law. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Strasbourg
7 judges |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:European_Court_of_Human_Rights
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Judge Costa
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2001-02-10
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Z v. United Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Changes in UK law regarding child welfare
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
ECHR 2001.
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
2001-02-10
Judgment delivered by the court. |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Not applicable
|
| gptkbp:language_of_judgment |
English
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Summary of legal context.
Context of European human rights. European human rights law. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Summary of legal framework.
European Convention on Human Rights. Framework of the European Convention. Influenced UK family law reforms. Strengthening of privacy laws. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Article_8_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
Established principles of family privacy. |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Compensation awarded
Summary of legal outcome. Outcome recognized privacy rights. Recognition of the right to family life. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Right to respect for private and family life
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Legal_Aid
Analyzed in human rights law. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Children_Act_1989
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involves a custody dispute.
|
| gptkbp:nationality |
gptkb:British
|
| gptkbp:notable_interview |
gptkb:Z
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Violation of Article 8
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a precedent for future cases.
Influence on family law Influence on future cases. Privacy in family law cases. |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
Child welfare
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
Judge Tulkens
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
A v. United Kingdom
K v. United Kingdom |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Child protection and privacy rights
Set a standard for privacy rights. |
| gptkbp:sound |
2000-10-10
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:the_European_Court_of_Human_Rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|