|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 8, 1957
October 8, 1956
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
354 U.S. 298
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 17, 1957
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkb:Charles_Evans_Whittaker
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
6
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Yates_et_al._v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Advocacy of abstract doctrine is protected by the First Amendment; only advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government is punishable under the Smith Act.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Yates v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Sherman_Minton
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Harold_Hitz_Burton
gptkb:Earl_Warren
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Smith_Act
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio
gptkb:Dennis_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|