Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. decision

GPTKB entity

Statements (30)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate October 8, 2008
gptkbp:citation 129 S. Ct. 365
172 L. Ed. 2d 249
555 U.S. 7
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date November 12, 2008
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkbp:docketNumber 07-1239
gptkbp:heldBy The Navy's need to conduct realistic training with active sonar outweighs the potential environmental harm to marine mammals.
Plaintiffs seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. decision
gptkbp:joinedBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
Stephen Breyer (in part)
gptkbp:legalIssue military sonar and environmental law
preliminary injunction standard
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
gptkbp:overturnedLowerCourt gptkb:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
gptkbp:petitioner Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:National_Environmental_Policy_Act
U.S. Navy sonar exercises
gptkbp:response gptkb:Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:2008_in_American_law
gptkbp:bfsLayer 7