|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
2016-02-22
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
579 U.S. 232
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2016-06-20
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
14-1373
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Evidence discovered during an unlawful investigatory stop is admissible if the officer's discovery of a valid, pre-existing arrest warrant attenuates the connection between the unlawful stop and the evidence.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Utah v. Strieff
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:State_of_Utah
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
attenuation doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Wong_Sun_v._United_States
Brown v. Illinois
Segura v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
Edward Strieff
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:exclusionary_rule
arrest warrant
evidence admissibility
unlawful stop
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Attenuation_doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|