Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
75-1 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
economic regulation
environmental regulation public health law |
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 10, 1975
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
upheld federal authority |
| gptkbp:date |
1976
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 2, 1976 |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of preemption
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
legal textbooks
law journals |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
1970s legal landscape
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Wisconsin
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal legislation
state legislation state regulatory powers |
| gptkbp:influenced |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
New_Deal_policies |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:State_of_Wisconsin |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
federal government
state government |
| gptkbp:is_used_in |
subsequent_Supreme_Court_cases
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
federal jurisdiction
federal supremacy state rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkb:Wisconsin_Attorney_General constitutional interpretation statutory interpretation |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
federalism
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
national news
legal commentary |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
available online
landmark decision 427 U.S. 245 law databases |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme_Court_ruling
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future cases involving state sovereignty
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial case
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._New_Mexico |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on state and federal relations
|