Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:EFF
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
no appeal filed
|
| gptkbp:affiliated_with |
gptkb:Internet_Association
gptkb:political_movement gptkb:Free_Press gptkb:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation Public Knowledge |
| gptkbp:case_types |
1:15-cv-00787
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
future of internet regulation
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Verizon
|
| gptkbp:impact |
internet service providers
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:Verizon_Communications_Inc. |
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
April 2016
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
subject matter jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
administrative law net neutrality telecommunications law internet law |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
Verizon's legal team |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
gptkb:Communications_Act_of_1934 |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:AT&_T_v._FCC
gptkb:Verizon_v._FCC influenced future rulings |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:memorial
market competition influenced public policy upheld Verizon's practices inspired grassroots movements affected consumer rights court ruled in favor of Verizon emphasized importance of open internet highlighted digital divide issues led to public advocacy campaigns raised awareness of net neutrality issues regulatory authority of FCC set precedent for IS Ps shaped regulatory landscape sparked legislative proposals |
| gptkbp:precedent |
FCC regulations
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
not applicable
mixed reactions supported deregulation |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Federal_Communications_Commission
|
| gptkbp:significance |
influenced net neutrality debates
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2016
|