Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
AT& T appealed the FCC's order
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed by legal scholars
discussed in legal forums analyzed for its implications implications for consumer rights implications for net neutrality debates relevant to ongoing debates on internet policy |
| gptkbp:case_impact_on_policy |
impact on telecommunications policy
|
| gptkbp:case_impact_on_regulation |
impact on telecommunications regulation.
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_consumers |
implications for consumer internet access
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_fcc |
implications for FCC's regulatory power
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
available in legal databases
summary of legal arguments |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed FCC's decision
effect on future FCC decisions majority opinion by Judge David Tatel significant for telecommunications industry upheld FCC's authority |
| gptkbp:case_relevance_to_isps |
relevant to internet service providers
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
significant in legal history
landmark case in telecommunications law |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects future FCC regulations on ISPs
|
| gptkbp:court |
D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals
|
| gptkbp:court's_decision_date |
January 14, 2014
|
| gptkbp:court's_decision_effect |
affects ISPs' operational practices
|
| gptkbp:court's_decision_rationale |
rationale based on regulatory authority
|
| gptkbp:court's_ruling_impact |
shapes internet regulation
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
dissent by Judge Stephen Williams
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
13-404
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
affects internet service providers
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
AT& T v. FCC
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_broadband |
affects broadband access policies
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Federal_Communications_Commission
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
742 F.3d 399 (D. C. Cir. 2014)
|
| gptkbp:issues |
internet freedom
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
important in legal context of telecommunications
regulatory authority of the FCC |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
framework for future telecommunications cases
framework for net neutrality |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
net neutrality
AT& T's challenge to FCC's rules |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Chevron deference
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analyzed by legal experts
AT& T's legal team |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Communications_Act_of_1934
|
| gptkbp:material |
background on FCC's net neutrality rules
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
court ruled in favor of FCC
|
| gptkbp:parent_agency |
gptkb:Federal_Communications_Commission
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
sets precedent for future cases
FCC v. Fox Television Stations affects future FCC regulations |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
considerations in telecommunications
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Verizon_v._FCC
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on telecommunications regulation
|
| gptkbp:topics |
telecommunications policy
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2014
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Verizon
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|