United States v. United States Steel Corp.
GPTKB entity
Properties (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
1920-1921
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1
civil |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
251 U.S. 417
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
1920
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court unanimous no violation of antitrust laws |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Justice_William_Howard_Taft
1921 |
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
shaped antitrust policy
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
post-World_War_I_economy
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. United States Steel Corp.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
corporate governance
economic policy regulatory agencies business regulations |
| gptkbp:influenced |
public opinion
labor movements Progressive Era reforms consumer advocacy |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:United_States_Steel_Corporation |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
antitrust laws
monopoly power |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice
market competition corporate mergers trade practices United_States_Steel_Corp._attorneys |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Clayton Antitrust Act
Sherman Antitrust Act |
| gptkbp:outcome |
dismissed
limited government intervention influenced future legislation established legal standards set precedent influenced market dynamics affected corporate strategies clarified antitrust enforcement defined monopoly standards impacted economic competition shaped judicial interpretation redefined_antitrust_litigation |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future antitrust cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:Standard_Oil_Co._of_New_Jersey_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:significance |
antitrust enforcement
|