United States v. United States Gypsum Company et al.

GPTKB entity

Statements (23)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:law
gptkbp:citation gptkb:333_U.S._364
68 S. Ct. 525
92 L. Ed. 746
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date 1948-06-14
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:United_States_Gypsum_Company
other gypsum companies
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Justice_Murphy
gptkb:Justice_Rutledge
gptkb:Justice_Douglas
gptkbp:fullName United States v. United States Gypsum Co., et al.
gptkbp:heldBy Knowledge of illegality is not required for criminal liability under the Sherman Act.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. United States Gypsum Company et al.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Justice_Reed
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:principle Sherman Act criminal liability does not require proof of intent or knowledge of illegality.
gptkbp:relatedTo Sherman Antitrust Act Section 1
gptkbp:subject gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
antitrust law
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Gypsum_Co.
gptkbp:bfsLayer 7