Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
203 U.S. 563
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
controversial case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Moody
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States |
| gptkbp:date |
January 1906
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1906
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
legal textbooks
historical journals law reviews |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
early 20th century America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Shipp
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future cases on state and federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
John_Shipp |
| gptkbp:judges |
none
unanimous decision Supreme_Court_authority |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
federalism
due process |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
criminal law
constitutional law civil liberties attorney for Shipp attorney_for_the_United_States |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
civil rights
federal oversight state sovereignty lynching case |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark case
reflected societal issues influenced civil rights movement influenced public policy shaped legal discourse established precedent highlighted legal protections contributed to legal reforms debated moral implications debated legal ethics addressed racial violence analyzed judicial authority analyzed legal consequences considered human rights discussed federal intervention discussed public safety examined due process rights examined execution methods examined state power explored justice system flaws highlighted federal-state tensions reflected on justice |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversal of lower court decision
Shipp's execution stayed |
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal authority over state actions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Ex parte Young
cases involving federal intervention |
| gptkbp:significance |
first case to address federal intervention in state executions
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
October 1905
|