United States v. Sanchez

GPTKB entity

Statements (58)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:argued_on gptkb:2014
defendant's position
government's position
gptkbp:case_number discussed implications for law enforcement
highlighted importance of judicial oversight
involved warrantless search
13-1073
addressed reasonable expectation of privacy
examined scope of Fourth Amendment protections
gptkbp:case_outcome decided
gptkbp:case_types gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:court gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:date November 2014
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:2015
reversed
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion gptkb:Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Kennedy
gptkbp:docket_number 13-1073
gptkbp:effective_date June 2015
gptkbp:has_implications_for civil liberties
privacy rights
law enforcement authority
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Sanchez
gptkbp:impact law enforcement practices
gptkbp:is_cited_in 135 S. Ct. 2158
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:legal_context constitutional law
criminal procedure
search and seizure law
gptkbp:legal_issue Fourth Amendment rights
gptkbp:legal_principle exclusionary rule
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
government attorney
gptkbp:outcome impact on future cases
law enforcement policy changes
search warrant validity
judicial interpretation of the Fourth Amendment
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Florida_v._Jardines
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates
established Fourth Amendment interpretation
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
gptkbp:significance Fourth Amendment interpretation
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
gptkb:Tenth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5