Properties (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
17-1672
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
588 U.S. 1
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
2018
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
January 2019
November 2018 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2019
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Sanchez
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law_enforcement_practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Neil_Gorsuch gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Kavanaugh Justice Clarence Thomas |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
constitutional law
judicial review civil liberties criminal procedure privacy rights law enforcement accountability impact on community relations impact on civil rights precedent for future cases search and seizure laws impact on public opinion impact on legal education impact on future litigation impact on public policy impact on government authority impact on legal precedents impact on legal standards impact on legal reforms impact on police practices impact on law enforcement training impact on public awareness impact on individual rights impact on judicial interpretation impact on legislative action impact on judicial activism impact on advocacy groups impact on civil liberties organizations impact on constitutional amendments impact on constitutional debates Fourth_Amendment_interpretation |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed lower court decision
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established standards for warrantless searches
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Carpenter_v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |