Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
oral arguments
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analysis of the case
implications for future cases implications for law enforcement related case law relevance to law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
19-1234
summary of facts summary of the ruling history of the case details of the case |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
conviction upheld
reasoning behind the decision findings of the court opinion of the court outcome of the appeal decision made ruling details |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
significance in law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
appeal
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2020
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
dissenting judge
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
19-1234
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine applied
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2020-06-01
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Parker
|
| gptkbp:impact |
legal interpretations
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Parker |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
No. 19-1234
|
| gptkbp:judges |
panel of judges
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
review process
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
context of the law
context of the ruling |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
framework of the case
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
criminal law
arguments presented |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
final outcome of the case
outcome of the ruling |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
principles involved
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
analysis of arguments |
| gptkbp:material |
background information
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
similar cases precedent set |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
majority judge
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
subsequent appeals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
important ruling
|
| gptkbp:sound |
2020-05-15
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|