Properties (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 70-1
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
70-1 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
404 U.S. 1
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 17, 1970
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
unanimous |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 25, 1971 |
| gptkbp:discusses |
law reviews
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
federal preemption
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
important legal precedent
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Ohio
|
| gptkbp:impact |
state laws
state-federal dynamics state compliance with federal law |
| gptkbp:influenced |
previous_Supreme_Court_rulings
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:State_of_Ohio |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
federal government
Ohio_state_government |
| gptkbp:judges |
yes
Justice Harry Blackmun |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
federal jurisdiction
supremacy clause |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U.S._Attorney_General
Ohio Attorney General |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
state sovereignty
constitutional law principles |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Commerce Clause
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
court records
federalism legal education legal scholars federal oversight constitutional interpretation 404 U.S. 1 (1971) federal authority upheld state limitations |
| gptkbp:outcome |
expanded federal jurisdiction
affirmed federal power decision_in_favor_of_United_States |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established federal authority over states
future federal cases |
| gptkbp:related_to |
interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._California
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on state-federal relations
|
| gptkbp:year |
1971
|