United States v. New York State
GPTKB entity
Properties (55)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
123 S. Ct. 456
|
gptkbp:consequences |
legal challenges
state compliance federal regulatory power future state regulations |
gptkbp:controversy |
federal government authority
state autonomy |
gptkbp:court |
majority opinion
|
gptkbp:date |
2020
June 2020 |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis |
environmental policy
legal implications impact on state rights debate on federalism |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. New York State
|
gptkbp:impact |
state legislation
|
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:New_York_State
gptkb:United_States |
gptkbp:judges |
affirmed lower court ruling
Justice X Supreme_Court_review |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
federal authority
state rights preemption doctrine |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:New_York_Attorney_General
gptkb:Department_of_Justice |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
environmental law
public health interstate commerce state versus federal law |
gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
important for federalism
|
gptkbp:outcome |
legal clarity
influenced future cases increased federal oversight sparked national debate influenced public policy limited state power prompted legislative changes led to further litigation inspired advocacy groups shaped legal landscape set precedent redefined state-federal relations enhanced federal authority ruling_in_favor_of_United_States |
gptkbp:precedent |
established federal supremacy
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed reactions
|
gptkbp:related_to |
environmental regulations
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._Texas |
gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 2020
|