Properties (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects state-federal relations
influences political discourse affects judicial interpretations sets precedent for similar cases informs public policy debates affects environmental advocacy affects litigation strategies guides legislative actions influences future environmental policy shapes legal landscape for states |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:deployedTo |
Supreme_Court_Docket_20-1234
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Minnesota
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal authority
state sovereignty |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
State of Minnesota |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch Justice Breyer |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkb:Minnesota_Attorney_General federal jurisdiction impact on environmental regulations principle of federalism principle of comity reaffirmation of state rights clarification of federal powers guidance for future litigation |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive coverage
analysis by legal experts editorials in major newspapers |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_Minnesota
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
affects future cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
mixed reactions
support from environmental groups criticism from federal agencies |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Texas
Minnesota_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
environmental law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
important for federalism
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
November 2020
June 2021 |