Properties (76)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced public opinion
awareness of legal issues advocacy for patient rights influenced state legislation upheld state laws perspectives from various stakeholders support from civil rights organizations reaffirmed state rights activism surrounding marijuana issues challenges to federal authority community responses to the ruling context of changing marijuana laws critiques from conservative groups debates on marijuana legalization dialogue on drug policy reform economic impact of marijuana legalization education on marijuana laws examined implications for patients future implications for cannabis policy important for advocates judiciary's role in marijuana law legality of medical marijuana legislation influenced by the case legislators' reactions to the case mixed reactions from stakeholders opportunities for reform policy changes in states regulation of cannabis use responses from legal experts societal views on marijuana trends in marijuana legislation public_health_implications_of_marijuana_use research_on_marijuana_policy |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
15-10038 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:San_Francisco,_California
affirmed lower court's ruling three-judge panel favorable to defendants |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from district court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. McIntosh
|
| gptkbp:impact |
state rights
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Diarmuid_O'Scannlain
published opinion |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
federalism Controlled Substances Act shaped public policy limited federal enforcement preemption doctrine guidance for future cases state medical marijuana laws federal government overreach medical marijuana affects federal marijuana policy protection for medical marijuana users |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Cole_Memorandum
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark case
involved multiple states 833 F.3d 1160 analyzed federal-state conflict relevant to cannabis law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed and remanded
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
McIntosh |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Judge_Michael_Daly_Hawkins
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal_enforcement_of_marijuana_laws
federal_policy_on_marijuana_enforcement |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Gonzales_v._Raich
potential for future litigation |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on state medical marijuana laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2016-05-05
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
2016-08-16
|