United States v. Line Material Co.
GPTKB entity
Statements (18)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
333 U.S. 287
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1948
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Robert_H._Jackson
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter |
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
No. 11
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
United States v. Line Material Co. et al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Cross-licensing agreements between patent holders that fix prices are unlawful under the Sherman Act.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Line Material Co.
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:US_patent
antitrust law |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Gypsum_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:334_U.S._24
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|