Statements (53)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
March 15, 2006
|
gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from lower court
involved illegal search involves search and seizure issues 05-1234 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
reversed lower court decision
upheld lower court ruling majority opinion favored civil rights shaped future Fourth Amendment cases |
gptkbp:case_significance |
important for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
landmark case in constitutional law. |
gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:crime
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:United_States gptkb:United_States_District_Court gptkb:Lewis |
gptkbp:date |
gptkb:2006
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 12, 2006 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Jane_Smith
dissent focused on law enforcement needs |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Lewis
|
gptkbp:impact |
civil liberties
law enforcement practices |
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Lewis |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
No. 05-1234
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
constitutional law
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
exclusionary rule
probable cause unreasonable search Fourth Amendment rights |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
remanded for further proceedings
decision favored defendant |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
protection against unreasonable searches
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
examined police procedures |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
influenced future rulings established standards for police conduct |
gptkbp:public_perception |
Justice John Doe
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on search and seizure laws
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
gptkb:Witness
physical evidence search warrant |
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|