Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
Unreasonable search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:application |
Public safety and law enforcement
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
00-8508 Involves thermal imaging and Fourth Amendment rights. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future Fourth Amendment cases
Regulation of surveillance technology |
| gptkbp:date |
March 20, 2001
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 11, 2001 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Kyllo
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
533 U. S. 27 (2001)
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Reasonable expectation of privacy standard
|
| gptkbp:judges |
5-4
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
Expectation of privacy Fourth Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:legislation
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Oregon
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Florida_v._Riley
gptkb:California_v._Ciraolo gptkb:Katz_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed and remanded
Evidence obtained was ruled inadmissible Reinforced need for warrants in surveillance Thermal imaging is a search under the Fourth Amendment Relevant to discussions on technology and privacy Thermal imaging constitutes a search Thermal imaging used without warrant Impact on privacy rights and law enforcement practices |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established limits on technology use in searches
Use of thermal imaging technology |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:Danny_Kyllo
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens Concern over privacy implications Protection of privacy in the home |
| gptkbp:sound |
November 20, 2000
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Alex_Kozinski
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|