United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
GPTKB entity
Statements (52)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
|
gptkbp:area |
antitrust law
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
used in law schools
still cited in legal discussions examined competitive practices |
gptkbp:case_number |
extensively documented in legal literature
No. 75-2008 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
IBM's business practices were upheld IBM's practices were deemed acceptable affected IBM's market strategies ruled in favor of IBM majority opinion written by Justice William Rehnquist |
gptkbp:case_significance |
critical for understanding antitrust law
important for technology regulation |
gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
|
gptkbp:consequences |
set standards for market competition
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York
gptkb:International_Business_Machines_Corporation gptkb:New_York gptkb:United_States |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Justice Harry Blackmun dissented
|
gptkbp:duration |
approximately 9 years
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
1984-01-10
|
gptkbp:historical_context |
rise of personal computers
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
|
gptkbp:ibm's_defense |
claimed no monopolistic behavior
|
gptkbp:impact |
regulation of technology companies
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
government and IBM
|
gptkbp:judged_by |
dismissed the case against IBM
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by appellate courts
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
1970s technology boom
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
antitrust regulations
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
monopolistic practices
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
IBM's practices were not found to be illegal
IBM continued its business operations without restrictions |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
examined market share |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
|
gptkbp:outcome |
shaped antitrust policy
IBM was found to have violated antitrust laws |
gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future antitrust cases
for future antitrust litigation influenced future tech antitrust cases |
gptkbp:publication_year |
1975-12-17
|
gptkbp:related_to |
computer industry
|
gptkbp:significance |
landmark case in antitrust law
|
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1984
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Shoe_Corporation
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|