|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 14, 1967
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 22, 1968
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Haynes
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:civil_rights_movements
gptkb:legal_reforms
gptkb:Constitution
gptkb:government_policies
gptkb:legal_education
public policy debates
legislative changes
individual rights
judicial review
civil liberties
law enforcement practices
legal precedents
due process
legal standards
privacy rights
exclusionary rule
court rulings
judicial activism
public perception of law enforcement
constitutional interpretation
search warrants
law school curricula
law enforcement accountability
legal scholarship
evidence admissibility
public awareness of rights
probable cause standards
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
390 U. S. 85
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Earl_Warren
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
criminal law
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Fourth Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent cases
|
|
gptkbp:propulsion
|
gptkb:United_States
Haynes
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
gptkb:New_Jersey_v._T._L._O.
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on search and seizure laws
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1968
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|