Statements (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
2000-10-04
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
significant for judicial independence
affects future judicial compensation cases examines judicial compensation |
| gptkbp:case_number |
originated in lower courts
99-1230 99-1474 taxation issue for judges |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
federal judges' salaries cannot be taxed
influences judicial salary policies judges' salaries are protected from taxation judgment favored Hatter's position judgment for the petitioner judgment ruled in favor of Hatter's tax exemption majority opinion supports Hatter unanimous ruling on tax issue |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for judicial pay
important for understanding judicial roles |
| gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Scalia disagrees with majority |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
99-1474
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2001-01-16
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
judicial salary adjustments
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
post-1990s tax reforms
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Hatter
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal judges' compensation
federal salary legislation |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Hatter
gptkb:United_States Hatter and the United States |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
532 U. S. 557
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
Supreme Court ruling in favor of Hatter |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
federal judges' compensation
involves federal judges' tax obligations |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
affects future tax legislation
upheld judicial salary protections |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
taxation of federal judges
constitutionality of tax on judges |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
federal judges exempt from certain taxes
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
no taxation without representation
|
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
tax law and judicial roles
|
| gptkbp:oral_arguments_heard_on |
October 4, 2000
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of Hatter
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
taxation cases involving federal employees
affects federal judges' salaries future tax cases involving judges sets precedent for judicial tax cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Will
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Hatter_v._United_States
judicial independence |
| gptkbp:significance |
addresses separation of powers
constitutional interpretation of the Compensation Clause |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Judge_Stephen_F._Williams
gptkb:Judge_Karen_Nelson_Moore gptkb:Judge_Frank_H._Easterbrook gptkb:Judge_Richard_A._Posner |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|