|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 10, 1940
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
law students
legal scholars
legal practitioners
political scientists
judicial historians
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:public_transportation
affirmed lower court ruling
economic regulation
upheld federal authority
resolved
federal-state relations
administrative law principles
legal precedent for future cases
judicial interpretation of commerce clause
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
administrative law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 6, 1941
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
gptkb:No._1
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:New_Deal_era
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Erie Railroad Co.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
federal regulatory agencies
transportation industry regulations
railroad industry practices
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Erie_Railroad_Company
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
250 U. S. 98
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Frank_Murphy
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Harlan_F._Stone
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
gptkb:Justice_Stanley_Reed
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal jurisdiction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
interstate commerce
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
expanded federal regulatory power
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
federal supremacy
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Police_Department
Erie Railroad's legal counsel
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
gptkb:Railroad_Retirement_Act
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
favor of United States
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent cases on interstate commerce
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._New_York_Central_Railroad_Co.
gptkb:Southern_Railway_Co._v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on federal regulation of railroads
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
1941
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Taft_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|