United States v. Erie Railroad Co.

GPTKB entity

Statements (51)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:caseOutcome set standards for future cases
shaped regulatory policies
clarified legal definitions of monopoly
defined competitive practices
reaffirmed antitrust principles
upheld antitrust enforcement actions
affirmed_by_the_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:caseTypes No. 1
civil case
gptkbp:citedBy 250 U.S. 98
gptkbp:consequences railroad mergers
transportation industry regulations
gptkbp:court affirmed lower court ruling
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 6, 1941
gptkbp:filedIn December 9, 1940
gptkbp:firstClaim led to stricter regulations
influenced public policy
shaped legal precedents
affected business practices
influenced regulatory agencies
gptkbp:historicalContext New Deal era
gptkbp:historicalEvent part of a series of antitrust cases
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Erie Railroad Co.
gptkbp:impact subsequent antitrust cases
gptkbp:influencedBy Clayton Antitrust Act
Sherman Antitrust Act
gptkbp:involved gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Erie_Railroad_Company
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Murphy
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
majority opinion emphasized competition
dissent argued for broader interpretation
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice
antitrust law enforcement
antitrust laws
reduced competition
impact on railroad industry regulations
monopolistic_practices
Erie_Railroad's_legal_team
gptkbp:notableFeature landmark antitrust case
examined monopolistic behavior
gptkbp:outcome judgment_for_the_United_States
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
gptkbp:precedent future antitrust litigation
established standards for antitrust enforcement
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._Southern_Pacific_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co.
gptkbp:year 1941