|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
gptkb:Robert_H._Jackson
gptkb:Walter_Jones
1940-11-12
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
gptkb:No._1
part of election law evolution
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
landmark ruling
reversed and remanded
shaped future election cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
important for election law
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
unanimous
1941-01-06
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Murphy
|
|
gptkbp:followed_by
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Mc_Gowan
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
1940s America
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Classic
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
increased federal involvement in elections
influenced Voting Rights Act
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:election
Louisiana election officials
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
313 U. S. 299
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
reversed lower court's decision
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_significance
|
critical for federalism
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
New Deal era legislation
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
reaffirmed federal election laws
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
election fraud
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
affirmed federal jurisdiction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
federal oversight of state elections
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
examined election integrity
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
voter suppression
state vs. federal authority
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed
|
|
gptkbp:preceded_by
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Mc_Gowan
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent election law cases
set precedent for federal election oversight
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Mosley
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established federal jurisdiction over election fraud
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Taft_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|