Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1935-12-02
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
Part of the New Deal court cases |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Unanimous decision
Majority opinion emphasized state rights Declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court Ruling against federal regulation of agriculture |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Landmark case in U. S. legal history
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:court |
Nine justices
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1936-01-06 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Louis_D._Brandeis
Dissent argued for broader federal powers |
| gptkbp:followed_by |
gptkb:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Great Depression era legislation
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Marked a shift in judicial interpretation of federal powers
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Butler
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future agricultural policy
Influenced the development of federal-state relations |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:Butler |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
297 U. S. 1
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Reversed lower court ruling
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review of federal legislation
Struck down key provisions of the New Deal legislation. |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:New_Deal_legislation
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Constitutional framework of federalism
Invalidated provisions of the Act |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act
Challenged the scope of federal authority Debate over New Deal policies |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Struck down federal agricultural regulations
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Federalism
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analyzed the limits of congressional power
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Agricultural_Adjustment_Act
|
| gptkbp:notable_quote |
" The power of Congress to regulate commerce does not extend to the regulation of agriculture."
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Act was declared unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:preceded_by |
gptkb:United_States_v._Schechter_Poultry_Corp.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases regarding federal power
Set a precedent for future cases regarding federalism |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Owen_J._Roberts
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Cited in later Supreme Court decisions
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Agricultural_Adjustment_Act_of_1933
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Set limits on federal government powers
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Taft_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|