Properties (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:advocatesFor |
1 hour
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Declared unconstitutional
Affected future agricultural legislation. Influenced future agricultural policies Set a precedent for limiting federal power. Impact on judicial interpretation of federal authority. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1
Civil case |
| gptkbp:category |
Constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
297 U.S. 1
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
1936-01-06 5-4 ruling Limits on federal authority |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1936-01-06 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
1935-12-02
|
| gptkbp:followedBy |
gptkb:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Great Depression
|
| gptkbp:historicalPeriod |
Important_for_understanding_federalism_in_the_U.S.
|
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Significant in the context of the New Deal.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Butler
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced New Deal legislation
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis
Constitutional review Unconstitutional ruling Dissent argued for broader federal powers Constitutional review of federal statutes Majority opinion stated federal overreach |
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
Majority opinion
|
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Struck down legislation.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Federalism
Constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act Debate over federal vs. state powers. Federal government exceeded its powers New Deal era legislation Set limits on federal power over agriculture Struck down key provisions of the act |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Agricultural Adjustment Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:Landmark_case_in_U.S._constitutional_law
Relevant to discussions on federalism Cited in numerous subsequent cases. Judicial review of federal legislation. Challenged the Agricultural Adjustment Act's constitutionality. Examined federal-state power dynamics Judgment against the federal government. Significant_in_the_evolution_of_U.S._law. Influenced_judicial_interpretation_of_the_Commerce_Clause. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck_down_the_Agricultural_Adjustment_Act
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
United_States,_George_H._Butler
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Owen_J._Roberts
|
| gptkbp:precededBy |
gptkb:United_States_v._Schechter_Poultry_Corp.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases regarding federal agricultural regulation
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Context of the New Deal policies.
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
|
| gptkbp:team |
Debate on the scope of federal powers.
Established limits on federal intervention. Outcome affected future federal legislation. |
| gptkbp:type |
Dissenting opinion
|