|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
March 27, 1978
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
reaffirmed constitutional protections
influenced future rulings
clarified legal standards
established legal precedent
significant ruling
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
gptkb:legal_case
constitutional law case
appeal case
federal case
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
influenced law enforcement practices
affected judicial standards for warrants
contributed to legal discourse on civil liberties
led to further legal challenges regarding searches
shaped legal interpretations of privacy
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
November 14, 1979
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
77-1180
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Barlow
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Angel
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
444 U. S. 29
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
exclusionary rule
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Fourth Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent Fourth Amendment cases
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
gptkb:New_Jersey_v._T._L._O.
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on search and seizure laws
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1979
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|