Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal case
No. 78-1004 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
579 F.2d 1162
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
March 1979
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1979
Judges |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Barlow
|
| gptkbp:impact |
evidence admissibility
search warrant requirements probable cause standards |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
Barlow |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
government attorney |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
judicial review
legal reforms civil liberties legal standards evidence collection rights of the accused legal interpretations impact on search and seizure laws court rulings constitutional rights government overreach judicial precedent law and society civil rights advocacy law enforcement accountability constitutional protections individual privacy rights public policy implications case law development legal doctrines federal vs. state law due process considerations search and seizure protocols law_enforcement_practices Fourth_Amendment_implications |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established_Fourth_Amendment_interpretations
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio |