Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
pending
legal errors during trial |
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
2022-07-22
debated in media Bannon_found_guilty influenced_future_Congressional_subpoenas |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
1:2021-cr-00628
|
| gptkbp:chargingTime |
contempt_of_Congress
|
| gptkbp:convictedOf |
2022-10-21
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:Steve_Bannon gptkb:Carl_J._Nichols significant significant media attention unanimous approximately 3 weeks ongoing process upheld by appellate court political strategist denied wrongdoing emphasizing the importance of compliance made post-verdict provided by the judge |
| gptkbp:dateOfDeath |
2022-07-22
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
| gptkbp:duration |
2021-2022
|
| gptkbp:enforces |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Bannon
|
| gptkbp:impact |
polarizing
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Steve_Bannon
|
| gptkbp:judges |
several
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:David_Schoen
set a legal precedent first trial for contempt of Congress since 1974 |
| gptkbp:maximumDepth |
two years
|
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notable_player |
questioning the legitimacy of the subpoena
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Congressional oversight
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
available in public records
widely discussed in legal circles affects political landscape test_of_Congressional_authority |
| gptkbp:outcome |
guilty verdict
|
| gptkbp:politicalPosition |
gptkb:Trump_administration
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Congressional subpoenas
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
high
highly publicized made_by_Bannon |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
other January 6 cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
January 6 Capitol riot
|
| gptkbp:research |
documents and testimonies
|
| gptkbp:servingTemperature |
30 days
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
executive privilege
|