United States v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
GPTKB entity
Properties (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
landmark case
No. 1 civil case antitrust case precedent-setting case federal case |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
| gptkbp:date |
1914
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 2, 1914 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
January 12, 1914
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Progressive Era
railroad expansion regulation of monopolies federal government intervention |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
|
| gptkbp:impact |
railroad industry
competition laws |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Baltimore_and_Ohio_Railroad_Company |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis gptkb:Justice_William_Howard_Taft gptkb:Justice_John_H._Clarke gptkb:Justice_Edward_Douglass_White |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
public interest
antitrust laws affirmed lower court ruling restraint of trade economic competition monopolistic_practices |
| gptkbp:outcome |
strengthened federal authority
influenced future legislation increased scrutiny of corporations established legal standards for antitrust enforcement ruling_in_favor_of_United_States |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future antitrust cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:United_States_v._E.C._Knight_Co.
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States Sherman Antitrust Act |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on railroad regulation
|