|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber
|
No. 1
|
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome
|
Affirmed
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
Federal case
Constitutional law case
Civil case
|
|
gptkbp:citedBy
|
144 U.S. 1
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
Dissenting opinion
Majority opinion
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1892
|
|
gptkbp:filedIn
|
December 5, 1892
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Ballin
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Federal legislative power
State_sovereignty
Judicial_interpretation_of_the_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_George_Shiras_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Rufus_W._Peckham
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan
gptkb:Justice_Henry_Billings_Brown
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_J._Field
gptkb:Justice_David_J._Brewer
gptkb:Justice_Edward_Douglass_White
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
gptkb:United_States_Attorney
Influential in constitutional law
Defendant's counsel
Constitutionality of a statute
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
Set precedent for future cases
Cited in legal arguments
Discussed in constitutional law textbooks
Influenced legal scholarship
Clarified scope of federal power
Referenced in law reviews
Important for federalism
Examined_in_Supreme_Court_history
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Statute upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Subsequent commerce clause cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Morrison
gptkb:United_States_v._E.C._Knight_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
gptkb:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
|