|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:appeal
|
from district court
|
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber
|
20-1234
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
criminal
1:19-cr-00001
|
|
gptkbp:citedBy
|
No. 20-1234
|
|
gptkbp:community_engagement
|
civil rights
law enforcement reform
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
March 2021
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
2021
panel of judges
|
|
gptkbp:district
|
gptkb:U.S._District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia
|
|
gptkbp:filingDate
|
January 2020
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
U.S. v. Walker
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
law_enforcement_practices
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
gptkb:United_States
Walker
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith
gptkb:Judge_Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
exclusionary rule
reasonable suspicion
Fourth_Amendment_rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:U.S._Attorney's_Office
Public Defender
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
criminal procedure
unlawful search
consent to search
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act
USA PATRIOT Act
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
high profile
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
constitutional law
law students
legal scholars
legal precedents
legal practitioners
future cases
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
closed
civil liberties
affirmed
law enforcement accountability
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:U.S._v._Jones
gptkb:Riley_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:research
|
testimony
surveillance footage
search warrant
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
search and seizure law
|