|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Travel_Ban_Case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 25, 2018
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
585 U.S. ___ (2018)
subsequent immigration cases
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 26, 2018
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
5-4 in favor of the government
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
17-965
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Donald_J._Trump,_President_of_the_United_States,_et_al._v._State_of_Hawaii,_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Proclamation 9645 does not violate the Establishment Clause.
The President has broad discretion under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend entry of aliens into the United States.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Trump v. Hawaii
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
legality of Presidential Proclamation 9645 (travel ban)
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Donald_J._Trump
|
|
gptkbp:precededBy
|
gptkb:Washington_v._Trump
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
future cases on presidential authority over immigration
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Executive_Order_13780
gptkb:Presidential_Proclamation_9645
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
State of Hawaii
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Establishment_Clause
immigration law
executive power
sanctions
|
|
gptkbp:website
|
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-965_h315.pdf
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:John_Glover_Roberts_Jr.
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:Neal_Katyal
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|