Trump v. Hawaii

URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Trump_v._Hawaii

GPTKB entity

AI-created image

Statements (38)

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Travel_Ban_Case
gptkbp:arguedDate	April 25, 2018
gptkbp:citation	585 U.S. ___ (2018) subsequent immigration cases
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	June 26, 2018
gptkbp:decision	5-4 in favor of the government
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:docketNumber	17-965
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Donald_J._Trump,_President_of_the_United_States,_et_al._v._State_of_Hawaii,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy	Proclamation 9645 does not violate the Establishment Clause. The President has broad discretion under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend entry of aliens into the United States.
gptkbp:legalIssue	legality of Presidential Proclamation 9645 (travel ban)
gptkbp:location	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Donald_J._Trump
gptkbp:precededBy	gptkb:Washington_v._Trump
gptkbp:predecessor	future cases on presidential authority over immigration
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Executive_Order_13780 gptkb:Presidential_Proclamation_9645
gptkbp:response	State of Hawaii
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:immigration_law gptkb:sanctions gptkb:Establishment_Clause executive power
gptkbp:website	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-965_h315.pdf
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:John_Glover_Roberts_Jr. gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Trump v. Hawaii