|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:530_U.S._57
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 5, 2000
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
99-138
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A Washington statute allowing any third party to petition for child visitation rights over parental objections violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Troxel v. Granville
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
limited state power to grant visitation rights to third parties over parental objections
|
|
gptkbp:legalBasis
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Washington_State
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Tommie_Granville
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
parental rights cases in the United States
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:family
child custody
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Troxel_family
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
parental rights
visitation rights
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:2000_in_American_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|