|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
334 U.S. 385
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Burton
gptkb:Justice_Frankfurter
gptkb:Justice_Murphy
gptkb:Justice_Reed
gptkb:Justice_Rutledge
gptkb:Justice_Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
Chief Justice Vinson
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1948
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
Witsell
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
State regulation that discriminates against non-residents must have a substantial reason
South Carolina's discriminatory licensing fees for out-of-state shrimpers violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Toomer v. Witsell (1948)
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
gptkb:Privileges_and_Immunities_Clause
Commerce Clause
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Toomer
|
|
gptkbp:politicalParty
|
gptkb:South_Carolina
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
States may not discriminate against citizens of other states without substantial reason
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Commerce_Clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution
Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
shrimp fishing licenses
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Comity_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|