|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_International_Trade
|
|
gptkbp:advocates_for
|
gptkb:Federal_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
99-05-00206
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_International_Trade
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
April 1999
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:1999
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
99-05-00206
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
September 1999
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Timken Company v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
U. S. manufacturing
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
100 F. Supp. 2d 1094
24 CIT 1001
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
antidumping duties
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
Judge Judith M. Barzilay
Judge Richard W. Goldberg
Judge Timothy C. Stanceu
|
|
gptkbp:judging_criteria
|
remand
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
trade law
substantial evidence standard
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Kirkland_&_Ellis
gptkb:Police_Department
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Tariff_Act_of_1930
gptkb:Trade_Agreements_Act_of_1979
gptkb:Trade_Act_of_1974
Uruguay Round Agreements Act
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Steel_Corp.
gptkb:Nucor_Corp._v._United_States
gptkb:Timken_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:Burlington_Northern_Railroad_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._Eurodif_S._A.
gptkb:United_States_v._International_Trade_Commission
Allied-Signal Inc. v. United States
American Iron and Steel Institute v. United States
United States v. American Steel Wire Co.
United States v. Zenith Radio Corp.
United States v. American Institute of Steel Construction
United States v. American Iron and Steel Institute.
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
market competition
international trade law
affirmed
foreign manufacturers
domestic producers
trade relations with China
U. S. import policy
antidumping measures
|
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Timken_Company
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
trade cases
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on trade policy
|