Statements (62)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law case
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 29, 1989 |
gptkbp:historical_debate |
March 21, 1989
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Thornburgh v. Abbott
|
gptkbp:impact |
prison mail policies
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
490 U. S. 401
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Pennsylvania_Department_of_Corrections
inmates |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
right to a fair trial right to privacy right to counsel double jeopardy clause right to free speech time, place, and manner restrictions prior restraint strict scrutiny due process clause public forum doctrine viewpoint discrimination content-neutral regulation equal protection clause overbreadth doctrine vagueness doctrine intermediate scrutiny chilling effect establishment clause free exercise clause government speech doctrine least restrictive means rational basis review content-based regulation limited public forum doctrine nonpublic forum doctrine compelling government interest ex post facto clause |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:freedom_of_expression gptkb:First_Amendment gptkb:Civil_Rights_of_Institutionalized_Persons_Act gptkb:Prison_Rape_Elimination_Act gptkb:Religious_Land_Use_and_Institutionalized_Persons_Act gptkb:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act prison regulations |
gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Turner_v._Safley
gptkb:Miller_v._California gptkb:Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc. gptkb:Gonzalez_v._Mc_Caughtry gptkb:Shaw_v._Murphy gptkb:Johnson_v._California |
gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled in favor of inmates
unconstitutional restrictions on mail |
gptkbp:precedent |
prisoners' rights cases
freedom of speech in prisons |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr. |
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Turner_v._Safley
|
gptkbp:significance |
affirms rights of prisoners to receive publications
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Turner_v._Safley
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|