gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Texas
gptkb:Texas_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Original No. 141
|
gptkbp:community_engagement
|
sustainable water management
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
state sovereignty
|
gptkbp:court
|
original jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 4, 2013
|
gptkbp:diplomatic_relations
|
Rio Grande Compact Treaty
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
regional agriculture
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:2013
|
gptkbp:environmental_impact
|
agricultural water use
|
gptkbp:future_plans
|
water rights negotiations
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:Rio_Grande_Compact
|
gptkbp:historical_debate
|
January 8, 2013
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Texas v. New Mexico
|
gptkbp:impact
|
water management policies
|
gptkbp:involves
|
water rights
|
gptkbp:is_a_document_that
|
available in public records
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
570 U. S. 1
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
gptkb:State_of_New_Mexico
gptkb:State_of_Texas
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
allocation of water resources
equitable apportionment
interstate compact law
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Texas
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_New_Mexico
impact on future cases
analyze implications
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Water_Resources_Development_Act
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
national news
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
Florida v. Georgia
Kansas v. Nebraska
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
landmark decision
final and binding
used in law schools
upheld Texas's claims
Texas awarded water rights
historical context of water rights
majority opinion by Justice Ginsburg
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
interstate water disputes
influences on future water rights cases
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
concerns over water scarcity
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Rio_Grande
|
gptkbp:significance
|
interstate relations
|
gptkbp:water_management
|
based on historical usage
|