Summum v. Pleasant Grove City

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	2008-11-12
gptkbp:citation	555 U.S. 460
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Samuel_Alito gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date	2009-02-25
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:docketNumber	07-665
gptkbp:fullName	Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum
gptkbp:heldBy	Permanent monuments in public parks are government speech and not subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Pleasant_Grove_City,_Utah
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution gptkb:Free_Speech_Clause
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Summum
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:monument freedom of speech government speech
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Summum_v._Pleasant_Grove_City,_483_F.3d_1044_(10th_Cir._2007)
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Summum v. Pleasant Grove City