Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
2011-03-01
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed by legal scholars
affects sentencing practices often cited in legal studies analyzed for implications on law related to federal legislation relevant to criminal justice system |
| gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from lower court
documented in legal databases involved sentencing enhancements 09-1136 summary available in legal reports |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion_written_by_Scalia
reversed lower court decision reviewed by legal experts implications for defendants reversed and remanded reversed lower court's ruling affects future sentencing cases influences future legal interpretations impacts legal community significant ruling in criminal law |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for sentencing law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
federal criminal law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:date |
2011-03-01
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
unanimous decision |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Ginsburg's dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2011-06-16
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Strong v. United States
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Strong |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
U. S. 2011
referenced in legal literature |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
based on statutory interpretation |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
federal sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
9 justices revised interpretation of law |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
criminal law
interpretation of statutory language |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
revised sentencing
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
review of sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:material |
involved a criminal defendant
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
interpretation of sentencing enhancements established new legal precedent |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:United_States_v._O'_Brien
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified legal standards
impact on federal sentencing guidelines |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_Strong
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|