Statements (59)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:New_Jersey_Appellate_Division
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
A-36-17
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
246 N.J. 320
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
self-defense cases
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Superior_Court_of_New_Jersey
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_New_Jersey fear for life |
gptkbp:date |
June 27, 2019
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2019
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Santiago
|
gptkbp:impact |
criminal law interpretation
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:State_of_New_Jersey
gptkb:Luis_Santiago |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Faustino_J._Fernandez-Vina
gptkb:Justice_Barry_Albin gptkb:Justice_Jaynee_LaVecchia gptkb:Justice_Albin gptkb:Justice_Anne_Patterson remanded for new trial |
gptkbp:keyPeople |
self-defense
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
imperfect self-defense
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
justification of actions
clarified self-defense standards New_Jersey_criminal_law |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
law students
judges legal scholars landmark ruling prosecutors burden of proof influenced public policy imminent threat shaped legal standards reasonable belief proportionality of response examined ethical considerations criminal defense attorneys discussed community impact retreat doctrine debated moral implications affected jury instructions addressed racial dynamics analyzed legal precedents considered legislative intent discussed mental state evaluated public safety concerns examined societal perceptions highlighted legal complexities redefined self-defense criteria reflected on justice system reviewed appellate decisions |
gptkbp:outcome |
influenced future cases
reversed conviction |
gptkbp:precedent |
self-defense law
|
gptkbp:research |
video footage
testimony of witnesses |
gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 8, 2019
|