Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
yes
misapplication of law |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2020-12345
criminal appeal |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 A.3d 456
|
| gptkbp:commanded |
5 years imprisonment
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high
|
| gptkbp:court |
State
majority opinion appellate court insufficient evidence Hargrove present strong case |
| gptkbp:date |
2020-06-20
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
court
|
| gptkbp:duration |
2 years
moderate |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Hargrove
|
| gptkbp:impact |
legal precedent
influences public policy |
| gptkbp:involves |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
yes
legal scholars guilty Judge A Judge B Judge C |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
state court
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
evidence admission |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
public defender |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
state law
state criminal justice system criminal appeal process |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
court records
law schools important for future cases affects future prosecutions current legal debates settled in court. important for criminal procedure |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction
upheld conviction affirmed by higher court reduced sentence on appeal |
| gptkbp:precedent |
yes
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:State_v._Smith
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2020-05-15
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
overwhelming evidence
challenge evidence |
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|