Sikkim High Court vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh
GPTKB entity
Statements (65)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:Constitutional_Law
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
WP(C) No. 123 of 2019
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Public Interest Litigation
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:Gangtok |
| gptkbp:date |
2020-01-01
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sikkim High Court vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State governance
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
Petitioner
Respondent |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court
State of Arunachal Pradesh |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2020 SCC On Line SC 1
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
2020-01-10
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Sikkim
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Judicial_review
Public administration Judicial accountability Judicial independence Legal disputes Legal opinions Legal arguments Legal challenges Legal frameworks Executive powers Legal principles Legal consequences Legal implications Legal standards Governance issues Rights of citizens Legal interpretations Legal reasoning Legal remedies Judicial precedents Interstate disputes Judicial activism Legal reviews Legislative powers Legal controversies Fundamental rights Legal analyses Legal doctrines Constitutional provisions Legal ramifications State autonomy Legal assessments Rights of states Administrative powers Legal conflicts Legal evaluations |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Constitutional validity upheld
Statutory provisions interpreted |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Federalism
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Advocate General
Private Counsel |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Judgment delivered
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Similar cases in India
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
Article 371 H
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Statehood issues
|
| gptkbp:sound |
2019-12-15
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|