Sikkim High Court v. Union of India
GPTKB entity
Properties (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
WP(C) No. 01 of 2018
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2018 SCC OnLine Sikk 1
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court
Gangtok |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sikkim High Court v. Union of India
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Judicial review
Public interest litigation |
| gptkbp:judges |
January 10, 2018
Writ Petition |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Article_14_of_the_Constitution
Right to education Right to work Right to information Right to privacy Constitutional Law Rule of law Right to equality Right to health Fundamental rights Right to life and personal liberty Equality before law Doctrine of separation of powers Right to constitutional remedies Basic structure doctrine Right to environment Advocate General of Sikkim Judicial review principle Article_21_of_the_Constitution Central_Government_Counsel |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Government accountability
Policy changes Legal reforms Judicial precedents Petition dismissed Public administration changes |
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Union_of_India
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Kesavananda_Bharati_case
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Keshavananda_Bharati_case
gptkb:Minerva_Mills_case gptkb:Vishaka_case Maneka_Gandhi_case Indira_Gandhi_case |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Central government policies
Sikkim_state_laws |
| gptkbp:significance |
Constitutional interpretation
Separation of powers Judicial independence Rights of states Federalism_in_India |
| gptkbp:year |
2018
|