Statements (65)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:context |
Emergency_period_in_India
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Minerva Mills case
|
gptkbp:impact |
strengthened judicial review
limited_Parliament's_power_to_amend_Constitution |
gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:Union_of_India
gptkb:Minerva_Mills_Ltd. |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Y.V._Chandrachud
gptkb:Justice_D.A._Desai gptkb:Justice_P.N._Bhagwati gptkb:Justice_R.S._Pathak gptkb:Justice_A.C._Gupta struck_down_amendments_to_the_Constitution |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional Law
protection of fundamental rights affirmation of the basic structure doctrine upheld the basic structure doctrine |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
AIR 1980 SC 1789
|
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Kesavananda_Bharati_case
|
gptkbp:relatedTo |
Constitution of India
economic reforms government policies historical significance social justice judicial independence economic justice government accountability legal frameworks judicial review legal challenges legal principles legal reforms separation of powers case law civil liberties fundamental rights labor rights rights of citizens rule of law social movements trade unions industrial relations constitutional amendments political history legal interpretations judicial decisions workers' rights Parliamentary sovereignty judicial activism judicial precedents legal history constitutional provisions political rights constitutional supremacy constitutional debates public interest litigation constitutional law principles legal doctrines constitutional governance judicial principles legal_arguments democratic_principles Article_368_of_the_Constitution |
gptkbp:year |
1980
|