Sikkim High Court v. State of Sikkim
GPTKB entity
Properties (56)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
remanded for further proceedings
resolved key legal questions |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
public interest litigation
Writ Petition No. 123 of 2020 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
2021 SCC OnLine Sikk 45
|
gptkbp:consequences |
for state legislation
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court
affirmed lower court's decision majority ruling Chief Justice and two judges analyzed state powers found in favor of petitioner issued directions to state |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court
|
gptkbp:hasAuthorityOver |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
preceding cases reviewed
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sikkim High Court v. State of Sikkim
|
gptkbp:impact |
on administrative law
|
gptkbp:involves |
State of Sikkim
|
gptkbp:judges |
none
2021-05-10 broad interpretation exercise of power by state full bench decision limited to constitutional matters upheld certain provisions |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
examined constitutional provisions
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
principle of proportionality important for civil rights constitutional validity impact on state governance principle of natural justice on future legislation set aside previous ruling Advocate General of Sikkim Petitioner represented by senior counsel clarified legal provisions context of federalism established new precedent in state matters state and central laws validity of state law Sikkim's_state_constitution |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
involved multiple stakeholders
important for state rights landmark_decision_in_Sikkim |
gptkbp:outcome |
favorable to petitioner
|
gptkbp:party |
Petitioner and Respondent
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
upheld the law
|
gptkbp:precedent |
in similar cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Sikkim_High_Court_v._Union_of_India
|
gptkbp:soundtrack |
2021-04-15
|
gptkbp:state |
defended the law
|
gptkbp:yearEstablished |
2021-05-10
|