|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Sabarimala_Temple_Entry_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
Supreme Court of India cases
2018 in Indian law
Gender equality in India
Religious freedom in India
|
|
gptkbp:constitutionalArticleInvolved
|
gptkb:Article_25
gptkb:Article_14
gptkb:Article_15
Article 26
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2018-09-28
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Indu_Malhotra
|
|
gptkbp:followedBy
|
review petitions filed in Supreme Court
widespread protests in Kerala
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
allowed women of all ages to enter Sabarimala Temple
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Dipak_Misra
gptkb:A._M._Khanwilkar
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
gptkb:Rohinton_Fali_Nariman
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
entry of women of menstruating age into Sabarimala Temple
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Indian_Young_Lawyers_Association_v._State_of_Kerala
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Indian_Young_Lawyers_Association
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
freedom of religion
non-discrimination
right to equality
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Indian_Constitution
gptkb:Travancore_Devaswom_Board
gptkb:Sabarimala_Temple
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Kerala
gptkb:Travancore_Devaswom_Board
|
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
ban on entry of women aged 10-50 years declared unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Indian_Young_Lawyers_Association_v._State_of_Kerala
gptkb:Shyam_Divan
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Sabarimala case
|