Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala
GPTKB entity
Properties (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:culturalImpact |
Encouraged activism for women's rights.
Encouraged legal reforms in religious practices. Encouraged youth engagement in legal issues. Highlighted the intersection of law and religion. Influenced policy discussions on gender equality. Influenced public discourse on women's rights. Promoted awareness of gender discrimination. Promoted understanding of constitutional rights. Sparked debates on religious customs. Fostered_dialogue_on_secularism_in_India. Increased_visibility_of_women's_issues_in_India. |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
September 28, 2018
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Long-standing debates on gender and religion.
Previous court rulings on similar issues. Sabarimala_temple's_traditional_restrictions. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Increased_discussions_on_women's_rights_in_India.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_R.F._Nariman
gptkb:Justice_D.Y._Chandrachud gptkb:Justice_Dipak_Misra Justice A.M. Khanwilkar Justice Indu Malhotra The court ruled in favor of the petitioners. |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Entry_of_women_into_Sabarimala_temple
Set a precedent for future cases. Constitutional validity of religious practices. Strengthened arguments for gender equality. Encouraged legal challenges to discriminatory practices. Advocate_Saurabh_Kirpal Article_14_of_the_Indian_Constitution. Article_25_of_the_Indian_Constitution. Article_26_of_the_Indian_Constitution. |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive coverage in national media.
International attention on the ruling. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Women allowed entry into the temple.
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Indian_Young_Lawyers_Association
State of Kerala |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Influenced future cases regarding religious rights.
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from various religious groups.
Opposition from conservative factions. Support from women's rights activists. |
| gptkbp:relatedEvent |
Government discussions on temple entry policies.
Legal challenges to the ruling. Protests by various groups. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Nadiadwala_v._State_of_Maharashtra
gptkb:Shayara_Bano_v._Union_of_India |
| gptkbp:significance |
Landmark ruling on gender equality in religious practices.
|