|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
Standard of judicial review
|
|
gptkbp:appliesTo
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause
gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
Commerce Clause
Economic regulation
Age discrimination
Disability discrimination
Economic liberty claims
Non-suspect classifications
Social welfare legislation
Substantive due process cases
Sexual orientation discrimination (in some circuits)
|
|
gptkbp:burdenOfProof
|
Plaintiff
|
|
gptkbp:compatibleWith
|
Fundamental rights
Suspect classifications
|
|
gptkbp:contrastsWith
|
Intermediate scrutiny
Strict scrutiny
|
|
gptkbp:courtCaseExample
|
gptkb:City_of_Cleburne_v._Cleburne_Living_Center_(1985)
gptkb:FCC_v._Beach_Communications_(1993)
gptkb:Railway_Express_Agency_v._New_York_(1949)
gptkb:Romer_v._Evans_(1996)
gptkb:Williamson_v._Lee_Optical_(1955)
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
Judicial deference to legislature
|
|
gptkbp:firstArticulatedIn
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co._(1938)
|
|
gptkbp:governmentActionUpheldIf
|
Rationally related to a legitimate government interest
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Rational basis review
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:presumption
|
Presumption of constitutionality
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Judicial review
Arbitrary and capricious standard
Legitimate government interest
Levels of scrutiny
Rational relationship test
|
|
gptkbp:sometimesCalled
|
Lowest level of scrutiny
Minimal scrutiny
|
|
gptkbp:standardizedBy
|
Most deferential standard
|
|
gptkbp:usedIn
|
gptkb:United_States_constitutional_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|