|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:application
|
Dorothy Van der Peet
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 507
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:Canada
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1996
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
Appeal dismissed
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_L'Heureux-Dubé
gptkb:Justice_McLachlin
gptkb:Justice_Sopinka
|
|
gptkbp:established
|
Van der Peet test
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
The Queen v. Dorothy Van der Peet
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v Van der Peet (1996)
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Section_35_of_the_Constitution_Act,_1982
Aboriginal rights
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Lamer
|
|
gptkbp:plotSummary
|
Case concerning the scope of Aboriginal rights to fish for commercial purposes under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
test for Aboriginal rights
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Aboriginal rights must be integral to the distinctive culture of the group claiming the right.
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:R_v_Sparrow
R v Gladstone
R v NTC Smokehouse Ltd.
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Section_35_(Aboriginal_Rights)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|