Statements (24)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:English_criminal_law_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:crime
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2000] 3 WLR 654
[2001] 1 AC 146 |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
2000
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Regina v Smith (Morgan) [2000] 3 WLR 654
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Lord_Hoffmann
gptkb:House_of_Lords gptkb:Lord_Slynn_of_Hadley gptkb:Lord_Millett gptkb:Lord_Clyde Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough |
| gptkbp:key |
Subjective characteristics of the defendant may be considered in the defence of provocation
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
defence of provocation
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
R v Holley [2005] UKPC 23
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
interpretation of provocation in English law
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
R v Camplin [1978] AC 705
R v Holley [2005] UKPC 23 |
| gptkbp:subject |
manslaughter
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:British_criminal_law
gptkb:Law_Lords |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Smith (Morgan)
|